Taylor Swift‘s attorneys have threatened authorized motion towards Jack Sweeney, a Florida school scholar who has been monitoring the personal jets of celebrities and public figures, together with Swift, and has been beforehand within the headlines for retaining tabs on Elon Musk’s jet.
Sweeney shared the cease-and-desist letter with The Washington Submit, which he acquired from Swift’s legal professional, Katie Wright Morrone.The letter accused him of inflicting “direct and irreparable hurt, in addition to emotional and bodily misery” to the singer-songwriter by means of his social media accounts. It threatened authorized motion if Sweeney didn’t cease what it known as “stalking and harassing behaviour.”
The identical Jack Sweeney was briefly suspended from X in December 2022 after his jet monitoring account aggravated Elon Musk, in line with The Washington Submit. Musk known as the monitoring of plane a type of “doxxing” and in contrast sharing this flight info, which is publicly accessible FAA information, to revealing his “assassination coordinates.” Nonetheless, Sweeney was again on X along with his flight tracker account since he agreed to abide by the location’s doxxing guidelines.
Morrone says that Sweeney’s flight monitoring bot has heightened her [Taylor Swift] “fixed state of concern for her private security.” She additional emphasised that the matter is essential to their consumer [Swift], although he may see this as a type of leisure or private profit. She additional famous that there is no such thing as a legitimate purpose for anybody to entry this info besides to “stalk, harass, and exert dominion and management.”
On the matter of the alleged connection between Swift’s stalkers and the knowledge on Sweeney’s jet monitoring account, Swift’s spokeswoman, Tree Paine, mentioned, “We can not touch upon any ongoing police investigation however can affirm the timing of stalkers suggests a connection. His posts let you know precisely when and the place she can be.”
Sweeney instructed The Submit that he perceived the letter he acquired as a tactic to intimidate him and cease him from sharing public information. The info shared by accounts is public by way of FAA & personal jet alerts, however Sweeney’s social media posts have made them simpler to entry.
“This info is already accessible within the public area,” he mentioned. “Her staff believes they’ve the ability to manage all the pieces.” The 21-year-old claims that the information he has is restricted perception into the cities the place Taylor Swift could also be current, just like her publicly accessible schedules for live shows or NFL video games.
In December, across the time when Sweeney acquired the cease-and-desist letter, Fb and Instagram disabled Sweeney’s accounts for monitoring Taylor Swift’s air journey. Sweeney then started posting updates on Fb and Instagram accounts known as Celeb Jets. However, then he acquired a second letter from Swift’s attorneys claiming that his posts constituted “harassing conduct.”
Curiously, the cease-and-desist letter from Swift’s legal professional and the deactivation of his social media accounts coincided when Swift was criticised for her personal jet’s environmental affect. Sweeney’s account estimated the jet’s carbon footprint, and Taylor Swift’s Taylor Swift’s jet apparently left a carbon footprint of 138 tons of CO2 emissions in three months, over which she was been ‘flight shamed.’
Taylor Swift had been reported to have the best carbon footprint from flying, which her representatives disputed, stating that her jet is often loaned out to different people.
Regardless of two letters, Jack Sweeney continues to share updates on Swift and different celebrities’ personal jets on completely different social media platforms, and he has created accounts on X that post-flight updates with 24-hour delay to adjust to the no real-time location rule of the location.
Sweeney’s lawyer, James Slater, responded to Swift’s cease-and-desist letter, claiming that there have been no authorized claims towards Sweeney. Slater argued that Sweeney’s account was protected speech and didn’t violate any of Swift’s authorized rights. “This isn’t about placing a GPS tracker on somebody and invading their privateness. It’s utilizing public info to trace the jet of a public determine,” Slater mentioned. “That is their means to attempt to quash a PR difficulty and bully my consumer to have the unhealthy protection die down.”
Sweeney shared the cease-and-desist letter with The Washington Submit, which he acquired from Swift’s legal professional, Katie Wright Morrone.The letter accused him of inflicting “direct and irreparable hurt, in addition to emotional and bodily misery” to the singer-songwriter by means of his social media accounts. It threatened authorized motion if Sweeney didn’t cease what it known as “stalking and harassing behaviour.”
The identical Jack Sweeney was briefly suspended from X in December 2022 after his jet monitoring account aggravated Elon Musk, in line with The Washington Submit. Musk known as the monitoring of plane a type of “doxxing” and in contrast sharing this flight info, which is publicly accessible FAA information, to revealing his “assassination coordinates.” Nonetheless, Sweeney was again on X along with his flight tracker account since he agreed to abide by the location’s doxxing guidelines.
Morrone says that Sweeney’s flight monitoring bot has heightened her [Taylor Swift] “fixed state of concern for her private security.” She additional emphasised that the matter is essential to their consumer [Swift], although he may see this as a type of leisure or private profit. She additional famous that there is no such thing as a legitimate purpose for anybody to entry this info besides to “stalk, harass, and exert dominion and management.”
On the matter of the alleged connection between Swift’s stalkers and the knowledge on Sweeney’s jet monitoring account, Swift’s spokeswoman, Tree Paine, mentioned, “We can not touch upon any ongoing police investigation however can affirm the timing of stalkers suggests a connection. His posts let you know precisely when and the place she can be.”
Sweeney instructed The Submit that he perceived the letter he acquired as a tactic to intimidate him and cease him from sharing public information. The info shared by accounts is public by way of FAA & personal jet alerts, however Sweeney’s social media posts have made them simpler to entry.
“This info is already accessible within the public area,” he mentioned. “Her staff believes they’ve the ability to manage all the pieces.” The 21-year-old claims that the information he has is restricted perception into the cities the place Taylor Swift could also be current, just like her publicly accessible schedules for live shows or NFL video games.
In December, across the time when Sweeney acquired the cease-and-desist letter, Fb and Instagram disabled Sweeney’s accounts for monitoring Taylor Swift’s air journey. Sweeney then started posting updates on Fb and Instagram accounts known as Celeb Jets. However, then he acquired a second letter from Swift’s attorneys claiming that his posts constituted “harassing conduct.”
Curiously, the cease-and-desist letter from Swift’s legal professional and the deactivation of his social media accounts coincided when Swift was criticised for her personal jet’s environmental affect. Sweeney’s account estimated the jet’s carbon footprint, and Taylor Swift’s Taylor Swift’s jet apparently left a carbon footprint of 138 tons of CO2 emissions in three months, over which she was been ‘flight shamed.’
Taylor Swift had been reported to have the best carbon footprint from flying, which her representatives disputed, stating that her jet is often loaned out to different people.
Regardless of two letters, Jack Sweeney continues to share updates on Swift and different celebrities’ personal jets on completely different social media platforms, and he has created accounts on X that post-flight updates with 24-hour delay to adjust to the no real-time location rule of the location.
Sweeney’s lawyer, James Slater, responded to Swift’s cease-and-desist letter, claiming that there have been no authorized claims towards Sweeney. Slater argued that Sweeney’s account was protected speech and didn’t violate any of Swift’s authorized rights. “This isn’t about placing a GPS tracker on somebody and invading their privateness. It’s utilizing public info to trace the jet of a public determine,” Slater mentioned. “That is their means to attempt to quash a PR difficulty and bully my consumer to have the unhealthy protection die down.”